Your CV is the first thing screened and the last thing you get feedback on. Here it is read the way a recruiter reads it — quickly, looking for reasons to stop — and every comment lands on your own document. Then it goes to work: tailored for each position, matched against each posting, and tracked through every application so nothing gets lost.
Results-driven team player with a passion for technology and proven ability to deliver in fast-paced environments.Working against youForty words that fit anyone. Lead with the one thing you want remembered — “7 years shipping consumer web apps; last one served 2M users.”
React, Vue, Angular, jQuery, Svelte, Node, PHP, WordPress, SEO, PhotoshopHalf rightFive frameworks read as unfocused at senior level. The posting asks for React and TypeScript — the tailored version for this position leads with those and drops the noise.
B.Sc. Computer Science, Ben-Gurion University — 2017
The review is drawn onto your original file, next to the line that prompted it: the buried win in the third bullet, the claim with no number attached, the eleven-month gap a recruiter will ask about. You see exactly what a reader would react to, and where — then download the annotated copy. The document above is a live taste of it; on your CV the comments come from your actual lines, your actual gaps.
Your profile is compared with the requirements of the job you pasted: what you clearly match, what is missing, and which claims sit close enough to the requirement to be probed. That last list matters most — those become interview questions, because that is what a prepared interviewer does with a CV.
The fit score is about the match, and it is deliberately kept separate from your interview score. Being a strong fit on paper earns you nothing in the room.
The same career, aimed at a different job, is a different document. For each position you get a rewritten CV that leads with what this employer is looking for, a cover letter that references their actual work, and a short intro message for the recruiter — all built from facts already in your CV. Nothing is invented for you; that would be a trap in the interview, not a help.
Not happy with a draft? Tell it what to change — “shorter”, “more formal”, “lead with the migration project” — and the documents are revised in place, per position.
Applying to many places is the easy part; keeping the thread is where it falls apart — which version went to whom, who you spoke to, what stage each process is at, what happens next. Every position here keeps its own record: the exact CV and letter that went out, your contacts there, scheduled interviews and deadlines, and the stage you've reached — from first application to offer.
Your practice lives on the same timeline: each round you rehearse is attached to the position it was for, with scores that show whether you're getting better where it counts.
Answer a few questions and one gets assembled and analysed like any other. If you are at the start of your career there is a junior version that asks for what you actually have — course projects, a part-time job, volunteering, a society, the AI tools you use — because a first-timer's evidence is real evidence, not an appendix under an empty work history.